Hamas Agrees to Disarm Under Peace Plan

Hamas Agrees to Disarm Under Peace Plan

On July 31, 2026, the Board of Peace released the full text of a roadmap to implement U.S. President Donald Trump’s comprehensive Gaza peace plan. The document outlines principles for ending military operations, transferring governance to a Palestinian technocratic body, decommissioning weapons, deploying an international force, and enabling phased Israeli withdrawal linked to verified progress (The Jerusalem Post).

President Trump announced the previous evening that the Board of Peace had reached a “HISTORIC agreement for the COMPLETE DISARMAMENT of Hamas and all other armed groups in Gaza.” He described it as “a monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY” and a “major milestone” in his 20-point plan. Trump stated that a new Palestinian government working with the Board of Peace would take over, while Israel would gain security against terror attacks from the Strip. Next steps for disarmament and Israeli withdrawal would proceed in “structured phases.” Once complete, a United Nations-mandated International Stabilization Force (ISF) would work with a new Palestinian police force. Trump thanked his team and Board of Peace members Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey (Breitbart).

The Board of Peace’s official statement confirmed that, for the first time, Hamas had committed to an actionable plan for relinquishing all its weapons, to be followed by Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. The agreement followed months of intensive negotiations under the Comprehensive Peace Plan and U.N. Security Council Resolution 2803 (2025) (Breitbart)..

Senior White House and Board of Peace officials described the framework as a historic breakthrough. Hamas accepted a roadmap requiring dismantling of its military infrastructure, destruction of tunnels and weapons factories, and withdrawal from governing Gaza. Officials emphasized the agreement rests on “zero trust,” with every stage requiring independent verification by an International Verification Committee (IVC) before the next phase begins. The central principle is “One Authority, One Law, One Weapon,” under which the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), a technocratic body, would hold a monopoly on weapons (The Jerusalem Post).

Disarmament would proceed in phases: first, police weapons transferred to the NCAG; then heavy weapons, depots, and tunnels decommissioned; finally, personal weapons regulated under Palestinian law. Clan militias would also surrender arms. A Social Peace Agreement would aim to end internal violence. The process is linked to phased Israeli withdrawal, monitored by the IVC and supported by the ISF. Officials estimated full disarmament could take 200 to 350 days, though timelines remain flexible and dependent on verified compliance (The Times of Israel).

Hamas official Ghazi Hamad, involved in the negotiations, stated the agreement is a “comprehensive framework.” He said weapons storage depends on gradual Israeli withdrawal and dismantling of Israel-backed militias. “We will not take a single step unless we are certain that Israel will also carry out its commitments,” Hamad told Al Jazeera. Implementation would begin only after fulfillment of the first phase of the Sharm el-Sheikh Protocol, including cessation of attacks and increased aid. On Friday, Hamad added that if Israel does not approve and endorse the deal, Hamas will refuse to implement it (The Jerusalem Post).

Israeli officials expressed skepticism. A statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the proposal did not meet Israel’s demands for full demilitarization of Gaza as a condition for any withdrawals. A senior Israeli official later reiterated that there would be no IDF withdrawal from the current Yellow Line without genuine disarmament of Hamas. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir called the agreement “unacceptable,” arguing that stopping targeted operations against Hamas members would allow reorganization for future attacks (The Times of Israel).

A senior U.S. official warned that President Trump would be “very, very disappointed” if Israel obstructs the plan. “We’re not asking Israel to do anything that isn’t in the 20-point plan that they agreed to initially,” the official said. Trump, during a July 31 cabinet meeting at Camp David, claimed Israel is “very happy about it” and that an understanding exists (The Times of Israel).

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had urged Hamas not to sign the deal during a recent visit for the funeral of former supreme leader Ali Khamenei, according to reports citing sources familiar with the matter. A senior U.S. official confirmed Iran’s effort failed, noting Hamas chose not to listen and that Iran can no longer provide previous levels of support (The Jerusalem Post).

The roadmap provides for the NCAG to enter Gaza after initial commitments under the Sharm el-Sheikh Protocol are met, maintain continuity of services, and conduct audits. The ISF, with commitments for about 5,000 troops from countries including Morocco, Kosovo, Albania, and Kazakhstan, would separate forces, train police, secure aid, and support decommissioning without performing police functions. Reconstruction, supervised by the Board of Peace and NCAG, would begin in cleared areas, with a pilot housing project planned for Rafah in early 2027. The Board has secured $16 billion in pledges, primarily from Gulf countries (The Times of Israel).

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres called the announcement “the only good news in recent days.” EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband also welcomed the deal, stressing the need for full commitment by all parties. The coming 14-day period will finalize implementation mechanisms, after which verified progress will determine whether the process advances toward demilitarization, governance transition, and eventual conditions for Palestinian self-determination (The Times of Israel).

Please join Blessors of Israel in praying for Israel and her people.

Dr. Matthew Dodd, Executive Director | July 31, 2026

Trump’s “Board of Peace”: Bold Vision or New Diplomatic Battleground?

President Donald Trump formally launched his “Board of Peace” on January 22, 2026, during a high-profile ceremony at the World Economic Forum in Davos, positioning the new body as a central mechanism for enforcing the Gaza ceasefire and reshaping the post-war political order in the region.

Flanked by international figures, Trump cast the Board of Peace as a results-oriented alternative to traditional multilateral institutions, promising decisive action in place of protracted diplomacy. Reuters reports that the proposal has unsettled some diplomats, who worry it could compete with—or marginalize—the United Nations. Trump amplified those concerns at the World Economic Forum in Davos, declaring, “Once this board is completely formed, we can do pretty much whatever we want to do. And we’ll do it in conjunction with the United Nations,” while suggesting that the U.N.’s considerable potential has yet to be fully realized (Algemeiner).

Hamas Must Comply

One of the Board of Peace’s first stated priorities is that Hamas must return of all remaining Israeli hostages. Trump publicly demanded that Hamas release the remains of the last hostage, Master Sgt. Ran Gvili, as a condition for Gaza’s political and economic future, a stance echoed by board supporters.

Parallel to these demands, multiple reports indicate that Hamas may be prepared to surrender weapons and tunnel maps as part of a U.S.-mediated arrangement overseen by the new board. i24NEWS reported that such a move would represent a dramatic shift in Hamas’s posture, though questions remain about who would enforce and verify disarmament on the ground.

The enforcement challenge is underscored by World Israel News, which detailed how the Israel Defense Forces have been digging a defensive trench along the “Yellow Line”—a ceasefire boundary separating Israeli-controlled areas from Hamas-held territory in Gaza. The fortifications signal Israel’s skepticism that political guarantees alone can secure long-term stability.

Rebuilding Gaza

Economic reconstruction is another central pillar of the Board of Peace. Jared Kushner, a key architect of Trump’s Middle East strategy, laid out a plan for a large-scale redevelopment of Gaza, emphasizing private investment, infrastructure modernization, and international oversight. Kushner has argued there is “no Plan B” for Gaza outside of sweeping reform.

However, the proposal has generated backlash. The Times of Israel characterized the vision as aiming for “catastrophic success,” warning that ambitious redevelopment without political legitimacy or local buy-in could destabilize Gaza further.

Meanwhile, Gaza’s existing governing structures are already struggling. A technocratic panel announced a $100 million budget for public sector salaries, highlighting the financial strain and governance vacuum that the Board of Peace would inherit (The Times of Israel).

Trump’s Master Plan

The Jerusalem Post reports the following details of Trump’s Master Plan for Gaza:

  • The plan is structured around a six-phase development timeline that begins in the south and advances northward.
  • A major section of the coastline has been designated for coastal tourism, with plans to construct 180 mixed-use towers.
  • The interior of Gaza is zoned for residential neighborhoods and industrial zones covering more than 25 square kilometers.
  • The infrastructure proposal includes a new port and airport, a trilateral crossing at Rafah, a freight rail line with a logistics corridor, and a network of ring and main roads to connect Gaza’s urban centers.
  • $25 billion will be needed to develop modern utilities and public services.
  • $1.5 billion has been allocated for vocational training and retraining programs.
  • An additional $3 billion investment fund is designated for commercial zones, business districts, and microgrants intended to stimulate local entrepreneurship.
  • The goal is to create more than 500,00 new jobs in the construction, agriculture, manufacturing, and digital sectors.
  • The multi-phase master plan is intended to turn the enclave into a regional economic hub by 2035.

Regional Influence and Diplomatic Maneuvering

Several reports point to Qatar and Turkey as key behind-the-scenes actors, counseling Hamas representatives amid the evolving diplomatic framework. World Israel News noted that these states may influence whether Hamas cooperates with disarmament and governance reforms promoted by the Board of Peace. Israel strongly objects to the participation of both countries on the Board of Peace because their inclusion may promote Jihad against Israel and its allies and empower other Islamist terror groups (Gatestone Institute).

The Rafah Crossing remains closed under Israeli control, though it may reopen next week if conditions are met, highlighting ongoing humanitarian and strategic pressures placed on Israel (Israel Hayom).

International dynamics remain fluid. i24NEWS reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to hold talks with U.S. envoys and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, signaling that major powers are recalibrating their roles in response to Trump’s initiative. Reuters also reports that Putin is willing to pay $1 billion from frozen U.S. assets in the U.S. “to support the Palestinian people.”

Support and Skepticism

While allies of Trump have praised the Board of Peace as action-oriented, critics warn of financial and political barriers to entry,including reports that full participation may require substantial monetary commitments of $1 billion.

Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to Breitbart, defended the initiative, calling it “not just a board of peace, but a board of action,” arguing that past frameworks failed precisely because they lacked enforcement mechanisms.

A High-Risk Experiment

As Israel fortifies ceasefire lines and negotiations intensify across multiple capitals, President Trump’s Board of Peace enters the global stage as a high-risk, high-impact experiment. Its success will depend on whether it can convert diplomatic authority into durable security, meaningful disarmament, and a sustainable future for Gaza — where political promises and physical realities remain sharply at odds.

Please join Blessors of Israel in praying for Israel and her people at this critical time.

Dr. Matthew Dodd, Executive Director | January 22, 2026

Trump’s Gaza Gamble and the Gathering Storm Around Israel

As world leaders convene this week in Davos at the World Economic Forum, Israel once again stands at the epicenter of rapidly unfolding diplomatic, military, and prophetic events. U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new international “Board of Peace” focused on Gaza has drawn intense global attention—along with growing concern from allies and adversaries alike.

Trump is expected to hold a signing ceremony in Davos to formalize the initiative, presenting it as a bold alternative to existing UN-led frameworks for Gaza’s future governance. The plan signals a dramatic shift in how post-war Gaza may be handled and reflects deep frustration with international bodies that have consistently failed to prevent Hamas terror or protect Israeli civilians (World Israel News).

International Reactions: Support Mixed with Skepticism

Several nations have already responded to Trump’s invitation. The United Arab Emirates and Belarus agreed to join the proposed board, while Norway and the United Kingdom expressed reservations, warning that the initiative could undermine established international mechanisms (Times of Israel).

Other world leaders have shown caution, concerned that the broader “Board of Peace” could weaken the United Nations’ authority at a time of global instability (Times of Israel).

According to reports, Trump has also extended invitations to Russian President Vladimir Putin and French President Emmanuel Macron, signaling a willingness to bypass traditional diplomatic alignments in pursuit of a new regional framework (Axios). Macron has reportedly rejected Trump’s offer. When asked about Macron’s denial on Monday, Trump threatened a “200% tariff” on French wines and champagne, adding, then “he’ll join” (Axios).

The Reality on the Ground in Gaza

While diplomats debate frameworks and governance, Israel continues to confront hard security realities. Israeli forces recently uncovered a weapons cache hidden inside a tunnel shaft in Gaza—yet another reminder that Hamas’ terror infrastructure remains deeply embedded beneath civilian areas (Times of Israel).

At the same time, reports indicate that senior Hamas leaders may be preparing to leave Gaza under a potential Phase II ceasefire arrangement. Such a move raises serious concerns that those responsible for terror and atrocities could once again evade justice and potentially resurface in the future (i24News).

Iran Raises the Stakes

Hovering over every discussion of Gaza is the growing threat from Iran. In a striking escalation, Iran’s parliament warned of “jihad” should Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei be targeted—an extraordinary declaration underscoring the regime’s volatility (Reuters).

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded with a clear and forceful warning, stating that any Iranian attack on Israel would be met with “unprecedented force” (JNS).

Inside Iran, unrest continues to spread. The regime has imposed internet shutdowns, violently suppressed protests, and inflicted severe economic damage on its own population—actions that have drawn growing international scrutiny (AP News; AP News).

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also blamed Israel after a planned Davos speech was canceled due to the regime’s deadly crackdown on protesters, prompting a sharp rebuke from Israel’s President Isaac Herzog, stating, “The same murderous Iranian regime massacring its own people day after day, executing innocent women and men for daring to call for their freedom, and spreading terror and death across the Middle East is in no position to lecture others on ‘morality’” (Times of Israel).

Instability Across the Region

Beyond Gaza and Iran, instability continues to ripple throughout the Middle East. In Syria, jihadist violence and ISIS-linked prison breaks have followed the rise of Ahmad al-Sharaa’s Islamist leadership, raising alarms among Kurdish communities and regional observers (Breitbart; Breitbart).

Inside Israel, security agencies have also warned of Iranian recruitment efforts targeting Israeli citizens, with heightened concerns in northern areas such as Tiberias (i24News).

Why This Moment Matters

Trump’s Gaza initiative may reshape diplomatic conversations, but it also exposes a sobering truth: peace cannot exist where terror networks remain armed, Iran continues to escalate, and international institutions repeatedly fail to confront evil.

For Israel—and for those who bless her—this is a time for clarity, vigilance, and prayer. As Scripture reminds us, “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: May they prosper who love you” (Psalm 122:6).

Israel’s challenges are great, but so is the faithfulness of our God. Please join Blessors of Israel in praying for Israel, her people, along with the citizens of Iran who desire freedom, and the leaders of the United States.

Dr. Matthew Dodd, Executive Director | January 20, 2026